Previous image preload Next image preload
Back to catalog
Lot 258
image_0 image_1 image_2 image_3 image_4 image_5 image_6 image_7
Frank Lloyd Wright outlines "The Language of Organic Architecture", signed and inscribed to Lewis Mumford
Frank Lloyd Wright outlines "The Language of Organic Architecture", signed and inscribed to Lewis Mumford
image_0 image_1 image_2 image_3 image_4 image_5 image_6 image_7
Description:

Wright Frank

Frank Lloyd Wright outlines "The Language of Organic Architecture," the "blueprint" for Wright's Architectural philosophy, in an original Taliesin produced eleven page typescript, signed and inscribed to Lewis Mumford

Typescript Signed and Inscribed, "To Lewis F. L.Wright," with usual hurried last name appearing like a "WT, " 11 pages, 8.5" x 11", [Taliesin, February 1953, an essay, typed at Wright's studio at Taliesin West with his unmistakable type face and spacing (inviting the possibility that Wright typed this himself), entitled "THE LANGUAGE OF ORGANIC ARCHITECTURE," and inscribed by Wright to New Yorker architectural critic Lewis Mumford, who adds a pencil notation at the top left of page one: " Feb 1953." Some minor edge wear, light toning at margins, two staple holes at top left, else fine condition. 

"The Language of Organic Architecture" is perhaps the most succinct elucidation of Wright's architectural philosophy. It lays out nine terms (but really principles) that defined what he termed "Organic (or intrinsic) architecture," which he considered "the free Architecture of idea DEMOCRACY." Wright's "nine-word lexicon," that he found helpful to "defend and explain whatever I have myself written on the subject," included: " NATURE," " ORGANIC," " FORM FOLLOWS FUNCTION," ROMANCE," " TRADITION," " ORNAMENT," " SPIRIT," " THIRD DIMENSION," and " SPACE." Wright offers a brief comment after each, observing how each term had been abused. (For instance, after "FORM FOLLOWS FUNCTION," he complains that "Too many foolish stylistic constructions are placed upon the slogan.")

After he lays out his general principles, Wright delves in deeper to analyze each term, perhaps the most important are his discussions of the terms " ORGANIC," and "ROMANCE": " The word ORGANIC denotes in Architecture not merely what may hang in a butcher shop, get about on two feet or cultivated in a field. The word Organic refers to entity, perhaps Integral or intrinsic would therefore be a better word to use. As originally used in Architecture, Organic means Part-to-Whole-as-Whole-is-to-Part. So Entity as integral is what is really meant by the word Organic. INTRINSIC."

" ROMANCE," like the word BEAUTY, refers to a quality. Reactionary use of this honorable but sentimentalized term by critics and current writers is confusing. Organic-architecture sees actuality as the intrinsic Romance of human creation or sees essential Romance as actual in creation. So Romance is the new Reality. Creativity divines this. No team-work can conceive it. A committee can only receive it as a gift from the inspired Individual..."

This essay originally appeared in print in Wright's occasional series of broadsheets as Taliesin Square-Paper 16 in February 1951, and again, in a slightly revised form in May 1953, under the title, Organic Architecture. The essay again appeared in an anthology of Wright's essays published by Horizon the same year, The Future of Architecture.

Lewis Mumford and Frank Lloyd Wright first began corresponding in the 1920s, after Mumford had contributed an essay to the Dutch journal Wendingen in 1925 in which he discussed Wright's work as a continuation of a line of innovation begun by H. H. Richardson and Louis Sullivan, as well as placing Wright in contrast to the European modernists like Le Corbusier. Mumford also characterized Wright's work as an ideal of form and expression ideally suited to the American landscape. An article along similar lines authored by Mumford for The American Mercury, elected a response from Wright in August 1926, in which the architect questioned the depth Mumford's understanding of his work. A set of exchanges culminated in their first meeting, a luncheon at the Plaza Hotel in New York, during the winter of 1926-1927 that would being a long and productive dialogue and friendship.

This friendship, born of mutual respect and a love of argument, came under enormous strain in the years leading up the Second World War. Mumford, a liberal Democrat, viewed the rise of Nazism and Fascism anxiously—as he detailed in numerous articles and two full-length works : Men Must Act (1939) and Faith For Living (1940) . Wright held a different view. His general distrust of empire compelled Wright to take a stand against American involvement in the escalating European conflict that struck many as merely isolationist—a charge that the architect roundly rejected.

The final straw for Mumford came in a broadsheet published by Wright: A Taliesin Square-Paper, subtitled as "A nonpolitical voice from our democratic minority"), which declared "HITLER IS WINNING THIS WAR WITHOUT A NAVY. We are facing a new kind of warfare that the British Empire, owing to traditional faith in a great navy, cannot learn in time even if we furnished the equipment... Our frontier is no longer England, nor in any sense, it is European. Our frontier is our own shores."

An infuriated Mumford shot back to Wright: "You dishonor all the generous impulses you once ennobled... Be silent! lest you bring upon yourself some greater shame." To this, Wright retorted: "There is no good Empire, there never was a just war." True to his principles, Wright remained steadfastly opposed to the Second World War, and war in general. Escalating the feud, Mumford published his response to Wright in the interventionist journal, the New Leader. The two did not speak for over a decade.

The postwar period saw a thaw in their relationship, and Mumford remained a great admirer of Wright's work, despite their personal and philosophical differences. And Wright, despite Mumford's public shaming of the architect in print, continued sending New Year's greetings, unanswered by Mumford. However in the spring of 1951, Wright forwarded Mumford a copy of Sixty Years of Living Architecture, inscribed: "In spite of all, your old F. Ll. W." The gesture moved Mumford to respond and the two began the process of reconciliation, and the pair continued to correspond until Wright's death in 1959. (Wright, Mumford, et al., Frank Lloyd Wright & Lewis Mumford: Thirty Years of Correspondence, 2001, 22-26)



This item comes with a Certificate from John Reznikoff, a premier authenticator for both major 3rd party authentication services, PSA and JSA (James Spence Authentications), as well as numerous auction houses.

WE PROVIDE IN-HOUSE SHIPPING WORLDWIDE

Accepted Forms of Payment:

American Express, Discover, MasterCard, Money Order / Cashiers Check, Paypal, Personal Check, Visa, Wire Transfer

Shipping

We do our own in-house worldwide shipping!

Applicable shipping and handling charges will be added to the invoice. We offer several shipping options, and remain one of the few auction houses who proudly provides professional in-house shipping as an option to our clients. All items will ship with signature required, and full insurance. Most items are sent via Federal Express, with P. O. Box addresses being sent through USPS. We insure through Berkley Asset Protection with rates of $.70 per $100 of value, among the lowest insurance rates in the industry. Our shipping department cameras document every package, both outgoing and incoming, for maximum security. In addition, we compare our shipping and handling rates against those of other auction houses, to ensure that our charges are among the lowest in the trade.

Upon winning your item(s), you will receive an invoice with our in-house shipping and handling fees included. ***We will ship to the address as it appears on your invoice, unless you inform us otherwise, immediately upon your receipt of invoice***

Third Party Shipping Option: If a third party shipper is preferred, the buyer is responsible for contacting them directly to make shipping arrangements. For your convenience, we have provided some recommended shippers. For your protection, we will require a signed release from you, confirming your authorization for us to release your lots to your specified third party Please copy and paste this following link into your browser: http://universityarchives.com/UserFiles/ShippingInfo.pdf. At that point, our responsibility and insurance coverage for your item(s) ceases. Items picked up by third party shippers are required to pay Connecticut sales tax. Items requiring third party shipping due to being oversized, fragile or bulky will be denoted in the item description.

Please see our full terms and conditions for names of suggested third party shippers.


After payment has been made in full, University Archives will ship your purchase within 5 business days following receipt of full payment for item.Packages shipped internationally will have full value declared on shipping form. International buyers will be responsible for any customs fees incurred.

Please remember that the buyer is responsible for all shipping costs from University Archives' offices in Westport, CT to the buyer's door. Please see full Terms and Conditions of Sale.

University Archives

You agree to pay a buyer's premium of 25% and any applicable taxes and shipping.

View full terms and conditions

Bid Increments
From: To: Increments:
$0 $99 $10
$100 $299 $20
$300 $499 $25
$500 $999 $50
$1,000 $1,999 $100
$2,000 $2,999 $200
$3,000 $4,999 $250
$5,000 $9,999 $500
$10,000 $19,999 $1,000
$20,000 $49,999 $2,500
$50,000 + $5,000